Scan the internet for status report on Climate 30 years after James Hansen's report to Congress essentially kick-off the Climate Change hysteria and nearly ALL left-leaning reports are "Hansen got it Right." An example of the claims can be found here.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2018/06/30-years-after-hansens-testimony/
Read the report in the Wall Street Journal, "Hansen got it wrong."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/thirty-years-on-how-well-do-global-warming-predictions-stand-up-1529623442
Kind of confusing. So what really happened? We ALSO found the following video in the RealClimate.org comment section.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2018/06/30-years-after-hansens-testimony/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2u_TIWPupw&feature=youtu.be
From the Real Climate article, one thing is certain - there is a whole lot of 'cherry picking" going on. Hansen's report offers a little something for everybody.
Running our usual check of the reliability of RealClimate.org, we found
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/realclimate/ which addresses the accuracy of their reporting, but says nothing as to their bias.
As one reads the RealClimate.org report on Hansen's testimony, it appears quite accurate. However, when one listens to the two sides in this debate, both sides seem to cling to Hansen's scenario A. The alarmists use it to show how bad future climate will be, while the deniers show how bad the projections have been.
What it does show is - how bad each side's claims are.
No comments:
Post a Comment